CFBA Rule Modification and Changes Discussion
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
CFBA Rule Modification and Changes Discussion
I think this would be a separate thread, ather then the type of battle this is the rules. I think this is a good place to specifically brainstorm tournament rules.
Leone19- Admin
-
Posts : 57
Join date : 2013-11-24
Re: CFBA Rule Modification and Changes Discussion
Out of curiosity why do adults have to stay with those under 16? It doesn't make much sense to me tbh because we don't need a hoard of parents being bored out of their mind watching their kids play something they likely have no interest in.
Thunder Dome- Posts : 45
Join date : 2014-01-04
Location : North Carolina
Re: CFBA Rule Modification and Changes Discussion
I think it's a good rule to make sure kids have a ride once the tourney is over, but I think the parents shouldn't have to follow their children up to the arena. Maybe push for tournament organizers to have chairs for parents to sit and talk to each other as the competitors are competing? I'm not sure that should be a rule, though.
Maybe if the age was lowered to thirteen and up can be unsupervised? I'm not sure that's a good idea, either, though
Maybe if the age was lowered to thirteen and up can be unsupervised? I'm not sure that's a good idea, either, though
SaintBlader- Posts : 34
Join date : 2013-12-28
Age : 26
Location : Oklahoma
Re: CFBA Rule Modification and Changes Discussion
I know a lot of hobby shops and parks have good places to sit so I guess parents could sit there. I mean parents have stuff to do a lot of the time and sometimes they probably drop their kid off at tournaments and such to get them out of the way.
Obviously a lot of the parents with younger kids would want to stay, but a lot of time the parents with kids 11/12 would probably just leave them and tell them to contact them with their cell phone to come and get them.
Should their even be a limit for age? I mean a parent should know if his or her kid is responsible enough to stay at the event with others without the parent and tell them to call when it's over or if their kid needs to stay and keep them from misbehaving.
Obviously a lot of the parents with younger kids would want to stay, but a lot of time the parents with kids 11/12 would probably just leave them and tell them to contact them with their cell phone to come and get them.
Should their even be a limit for age? I mean a parent should know if his or her kid is responsible enough to stay at the event with others without the parent and tell them to call when it's over or if their kid needs to stay and keep them from misbehaving.
Thunder Dome- Posts : 45
Join date : 2014-01-04
Location : North Carolina
Re: CFBA Rule Modification and Changes Discussion
I think some additions to the rules (such as penalties for certain rule breaks, illegal customizations, and some clauses for judges) would be good. I'll outline them below:
I also feel that the selection of a B-Daman and how it is selected should be specified.
- Penalties:
- Penalty Conditions:
-If a B-Der touches the center part or blocks of the Break Bomber stadium during an active round, the opponent automatically wins the round.
-If a B-Der moves the walls of the stadium during a round, they automatically lose the round.
-If a B-Der moves his/her B-Daman out of the specified area, they automatically lose the round.
-If a B-Der begins to load/fire their B-Daman too early, they automatically lose the round.
-(If a B-Der lifts his/her B-Daman off or out of the stadium, he/she automatically loses the round.) (Optional rule)
-(If a B-Der fires his/her B Daman without its foot parts being secure on the floor of the stadium, he/she automatically loses the round.) (optional rule)
-B-Ders may not aim into the air. If one does, their opponent automatically wins the round.
-If a B-Daman breaks during a round, the B-DaBattle is automatically lost and the player must replace the part. Note: this does not include removable parts (such as Sasword's horn).
- Illegal Modifications:
- I personally feel that you should not be able to use arm parts from the Emblem Charge System with cores from the Core Change system as they can change the way the core functions and can potentially cause breakage such as with the Rev Core.
I also feel that Triple-Gillusion should not be legal as it uses three different cores.
- Special Clauses for Judges:
- -Judges may call timeouts whenever they deem necessary, but must give an explanation. Note: B-Ders cannot call timeouts.
-If a judge feels that a B-Der is hoarding B-Dama, they may call a timeout and redistribute the B-Dama.
-If a judge must adjust the center part of a stadium or barriers, they may call a timeout and adjust it.
-A judge may call a timeout if a B-Der's B-Daman is malfunctioning as long as the B-Der can replace the part with another of the same part or repair the part. If a B-Der cannot replace or repair the part, he/she will either have to continue with the malfunctioning part or forfeit.
-If a judge calls a timeout, both B-Ders must stop immediately. If a B-Der continues to reload or fire during a timeout, they automatically lose the round.
-When the timeout is over, B-Ders will have another countdown with their hands off their B-Daman until play begins again.
I also feel that the selection of a B-Daman and how it is selected should be specified.
SaintBlader- Posts : 34
Join date : 2013-12-28
Age : 26
Location : Oklahoma
Re: CFBA Rule Modification and Changes Discussion
There are a few changes I think would make it more fair.
1. I think an automatic loss for what could be an honest mistake is a bit steep. I say if one of the rules is broken, the fighter receives a warning. If it happens again, their opponent gets one red bomb (leave the bricks, just take the bomb out), and then the third time they would forfeit the round.
2. Hoarding B-dama isn't that bad, as it's a strategy and has downsides, ie by not using the b-dama, the fighter will fall behind.
3. A fighter can call timeout at any time if they feel that bricks or bombs on their side are obstructing their play. They may not take action, however, until a judge validates their request. If a b-dama leaves the field of play, it is the judges responsibility to retrieve/keep track of it, and when the next bomb is knocked out, the judge may redistribute b-dama equally (if there is an unequal amount of b-dama, the player who just won the bomb gets one extra).
1. I think an automatic loss for what could be an honest mistake is a bit steep. I say if one of the rules is broken, the fighter receives a warning. If it happens again, their opponent gets one red bomb (leave the bricks, just take the bomb out), and then the third time they would forfeit the round.
2. Hoarding B-dama isn't that bad, as it's a strategy and has downsides, ie by not using the b-dama, the fighter will fall behind.
3. A fighter can call timeout at any time if they feel that bricks or bombs on their side are obstructing their play. They may not take action, however, until a judge validates their request. If a b-dama leaves the field of play, it is the judges responsibility to retrieve/keep track of it, and when the next bomb is knocked out, the judge may redistribute b-dama equally (if there is an unequal amount of b-dama, the player who just won the bomb gets one extra).
Similar topics
» Rule Clarifications
» The WBO and CFBA
» Surge Strike Discussion
» Questions about the CFBA
» CFBA Tournament Rules (Ver. 1.3)
» The WBO and CFBA
» Surge Strike Discussion
» Questions about the CFBA
» CFBA Tournament Rules (Ver. 1.3)
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|